Sunday, December 16, 2012

No Smoking | Editor's Pen

Hi Friends,

Recently I read an interesting piece by Reema Kagti about ‘depiction of smoking in movies’ and censorship around it. She raised some really valid points. If Government wants to curb the menace, they should take rather strong steps than making mockery of freedom of expression.
 
When Government says that it looks cool to see stars smoking on screen and kids try to emulate them, the logic fails badly. Kids don’t smoke because they emulate actors. They do because they see real people smoking. Their parents, uncles, friends, elder brothers, cousins, teachers... If Government wants to stop it, they should ban smoking in anyone’s view, not just public places. Also, if smoking is not acceptable, why do we have it on sale on every third lane? Reduce the visibility from public life, it will disappear from cinema. Cinema reflects reality. Real people smoke. That should come on screen. If real people stop smoking, it will disappear.
 
+1 to Reema. If Government wants tobacco revenues, they should not try to be hypocrite about it. 
 
Its year end. We are gearing up for Blue Notebook... Any suggestions?
 
Regards
Sujoy Ghosh
 

To Sir, With Love | Critique

Based on E. R. Braithwaite celebrated book by the same name, To Sir, With Love is a fine example where a simple nice story backed by decent performances and a good song attains cult status over years. As the saying goes, its difficult to be simple; Sidney Poitier starrer achieves that without much difficulty.
 
Mark Thackeray (Poitier) joins a school in London as a teacher. This job is not a passion for him. Its sort of a stop gap arrangement before he can get a good job. The students are rough and like to bother every new teacher. Other teachers in school are least bothered about them. They do their work mechanically. They are not interested in children and their growth as individual. Thackeray finds it difficult to adjust to this environment. He decides to make some elementary changes in approach. As the story flows, we realize what impact the changes had on the psychology of children, how it influences their outlook towards life and what they make out of their life.
 
Well supported by entire cast, Poitier plays his role with great conviction. Though it’s sort of a routine role for the Academy winner, it’s worth to note that the conviction Poitier shows in his character shows how close he is to the persona of Mark Thackeray. Lulu’s music was another highlight of the movie. Title song sung by her contributed a lot to the popularity of the movie. Direction is good but nothing to write home about.
 
Written By: Sujoy Ghosh
 
 

Innuendo | Multi-layered Indie | The Critique

Indie in India is growing. They might not have set BO on fire but have definitely made a mark for themselves. Innuendo is one such indie effort. Made on a paltry budget, it successfully converted some of the handicaps into an advantage. Arvind Kamath along with a talented team made a movie that delivers well. One needs a vision to make a good film, budget is secondary.
 
The story of Innuendo revolves around three subplots – a mother trying to come close to her son, a writer and his imagination and a bunch of friends celebrating. The first subplot comes out very strongly and undoubtedly is the strong point of the film. The thirst subplot is the weak link. Though three stories seemed to be pretty insulated from each other, one can reason the connect easily. From script point of view, it’s an achievement of some sort. Innuendo literally means  an insinuation about a person or thing or incident. By the time credits roll, you realize how nicely title reflects the content of the movie. Usage of metaphors is equally laudable.
 
Performances are pretty decent. However like most of the indies, in some scenes one might find actors trying to act too hard. It might be a little turnoff though. But overall, the interpretation of characters comes out well on screen. Camerawork is good. Music is a little overdone, in my humble opinion. Editing is very crisp. Overall, technically and from performance point of view, it’s pretty decent. Direction is really good. Execution of some scenes is studio quality.

It’s not path breaking movie or something that will change the world. However, it’s a strong and honest effort. Indie... carry on the good work...
 
Written By: Sujoy Ghosh
 
 
 
 

Playing With Pain | Part – 2 | The I In Cinema | Under Lens

Its central performance aside, Rockstar also serves as fodder for the intelligent mind. Never once taking you for granted, it deftly presents its second half as more of a meditative trance than just a build-up toward the climax. Not that the first half is anything bad. In one of the film’s best written scenes, Janardhan stands behind Heer, who in her Kashmiri bridal wear, sits before a mirror and tells, ”Pooch mat, warna main sacch bol dungi.” He says, “Haan to bol de na.” “Haan,” comes her reply, implying that she is ready to elope with him. Naturally, Janardhan is too naïve to understand. This is a brilliantly written and performed scene which oozes just the right amount of subtlety and also goes on to show the contrasting patterns that both of these characters exhibit in the movie’s second half. On my second viewing of Rockstar, I found it to be even more enriching and engrossing and it seemed to overcome, what I thought were its flaws – its uneven structure and the actress. There is something in Nargis Fakhri that lends to the character of Heer. Maybe a mischievous twinkle in her eye, may be a certain reluctance, something which I can’t quite place a finger upon.

Alas, the same cannot be said about the cast that forms Heer’s family. When Jordan arrives at their home for dinner, I almost expected Heer’s husband to step up to him, shake his hand and say, “We are a family of such laughably horrible actors that we are thinking of saying grace just because you are here.”

So much talent has gone into making this film, that it would only seem befitting if I gave credit to everyone. But time, space and memory prevent me from doing so in detail. Bringing Ali’s vision to the final stages of fruition is a wonderfully assembled cast that comprises of the late Shammi Kapoor, Piyush Mishra, Kumud Mishra and Aditi Rao Hydari.

Giving the film a grungy feel in the rock concert portions, a foggy look to Delhi’s Pitampura and capturing Prague in all its glory, Anil Mehta deserves a loud round of applause. And we all have Aarti Bajaj to thank for, when it comes to the editing. On a side note, I must also add that Imtiaz Ali has said that the film was written with this particular structure right from the beginning. Putting behind all the flak that he had received for his recent tunes and compositions (Raavan, CWG anthem, Jhootha Hi Sahi remember?), A.R.Rahman does what he does best. From the soul cleansing Kun Faaya Kun to the melodious ballad that is Tum Ho, from the pulse-pounding Saadda Haq to the beckoning Nadaan Parinde, Rahman beefs up his oeuvre with yet another winner. The simple, soulful lyrics by Irshad Kamil complement the ingenious, masterful tunes of the maestro, thereby making this album one of the best soundtracks of the year. And it feels so gratifying to see Mohit Chauhan credited under Jordan’s vocals, without whom the voice of Jordan would be lost under all his angst.

Speaking of which, I would have to write an entirely separate post to give you an idea about Jordan in detail. Ranbir’s Jordan is a wildly compulsive eccentric who is as unpredictable as they come. Ranbir embodies the character of Janardhan and Jordan with equal ease and at times his Jordan becomes so unpredictable and wild-headed that it’s impossible not to marvel at this lad’s range and depth. Here’s an actor who is not afraid of dipping his character in the dirtiest of materials, one who is not afraid of making a complete ass of himself, one who rises above the script so that there can be no more scope for any sort of improvisation. Watch out for that scene in which Ranbir lets out a wail of anguish, trying to exorcise his demons in the middle of the Wings of Fire concert. This is not only a powerhouse performance; it is a textbook with a checklist of do’s and don’ts while acting. Ali intelligently steps aside from the clichés that movies like this are plagued with – he does away with the drugs and alcohol aftermath. Jordan is just a wandering soul, a lost loner. As Khatana puts it in one of the movie’s scenes, “Wo jo kucch ladke hote hain na ji, jinka dimaag kahin aur hota hai…”
As the film draws closer to its inevitable end, you feel a strange sense of relief flooding in on you. Poignant as it might be, it shows Imtiaz’s forte as a master storyteller. Ali shows a beautiful montage of Jordan’s and Heer’s moments together – the only memories that Jordan has with him in the end. And a journey is complete. The bird is home.

Written By: Gyandeep Pattnayak

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Prayers For The Smile | Editor's Pen

Hi Friends,

The decade of 90s would be remembered for two beauties - Madhuri Dikshit and Manisha Koirala. Both saw the pinnacle and silently faded... and left behind beautiful memories. There are hardly couple of things to talk about when we look at the 90s. These two actresses are there at the top.

Manisha Koirala started her career with Saudagar. This Subhash Ghai blockbuster is remembered for the illustrious starcast that included Dileep Kumar and Raj Kumar. However, the talk of the B-town was the actress. Manisha established herself as a competent actress with Bombay, Akele Hum Akele Tum and Khamoshi. Born in a prominent political family in Nepal, Manisha chose the world of glitter and established herself. Controversies were always around the corner and more than often, stamped the feminist outlook of an independent woman.

Today she is struggling with Ovarian Cancer, as per latest reports. With all love we have in our heart, we would like to wish 'Get Well Soon'. The world will be a very dark place with your mesmerising smile.

With prayers...
Sujoy Ghosh
(On behalf of entire TRM family)

Garam Hava In 3 Act Structure | Under Lens

M.S. Sathyu’s film based on Ismat Chugtai’s short story adapted by Kaifi Azmi. Garam Hawa is a fine example of good cinema relevant in the times it was made and even decades beyond. Brilliant performances by Balraj Sahni, Geeta Siddharth and AK Hangal were well supported by Farooq Shaikh and Jalal Agha. Movie will be remembered for sensitive handling of a controversial subject and dialogues.
 
Act 1: In the first part Mirza family is introduced. India is seeking independence and partition is inevitable. Mirza family doesn’t want to leave nation for one or another reason. However, Pakistan, the newly formed entity, is making promises too good to believe. A section of Hindu community believes that since Pakistan is made, Muslims should leave. Not only the political scenario, life of a middle class Muslim family is also explored in this act. A poetic start is used to subtly reveal traumas of partition.
 
Act 2: This act makes a strong impact. Family is broken by politics and new economic dynamics. Mirzas are not able to handle either of them. At a point, Pakistan seems to be destiny, bnot destination. Every reason that has stopped Salim Mirza, the protagonist, to take step towards new state has shattered. His older brother is well settled in Pakistan. Business is in shambles. Old mother, who wanted to die in ancestral house dies peacefully. Daughter who failed in love commits suicide. One son has left for Pakistan and other is jobless. Salim, himself, is tagged as a spy. Life has become difficult for Muslims in India.
 
Act 3: The trick in Act 3 is that it should reflect Act 1 in some way. Same aspirations, same ideology shall rise. This happens in Garam Hava. While Salim Mirza, his wife and unemployed son are going to Pakistan, they see an agitation led by his son’s friends. The seeds of the agitation was sown by his own son who wants to remain in India and develop it. Salim decides to stay back. The problems in this country must be the same as in that country. Pakistan cannot be very different from India. They cannot live life of refugees. Aspirations of a new state shall survive the scorching wings of changing times.  

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh

Inherit The Wind | Monkey Trial | The Critique

How man appeared on world? Like what Bible tells us or what Charles Darwin explored and concluded. Creation versus evolution. Based on a real life incident where John Scopes is arrested in Dayton, Tennesse for teaching evolution, Inherit The Wind questioned prevalent McCarthyism and practices. Inherit The Wind is not very hard hitting. It subtly puts forward a rational point. It doesn’t rely on lengthy speeches. It, rather, tries to provoke grey cells of viewer. It asks that isn’t like all fundamental rights, right to think is equally important?
 
School teacher Cates is caught for teaching Evolution. Teaching Evolution is prohibited. Mediaperson Hornback decides to back Cates for both personal and professional reason. Col. Brady is brought to prosecute Cates. Brady is a highly respected, failed presidential candidate and Biblical scholar. He is doesn’t believe in Evolution and wants to make a point. However, to support cause of Cates, one of his old friends turned rival Henry Drummond decide to defend Cates and Evolution. Since law questions Cates stand, witnesses advocating Evolution are not admissible. Drummond questions the partition between the ideologies and question the literal interpretation of the Book.
 
Spencer Tracy and Fredric March deliver fine performances as competing lawyers. Their mutual admiration for each other as actor and person is visible. Director Stanley Kramer picked another meaningful subject and made a relevant movie. Spencer Tracy and Stanley Kramer teamed up for many projects – remarkable pieces of cinema, Inherit The Wind was first of them. Inherit The Wind works on two levels – at one level it makes a point that with time one need to see beyond existing knowledge and accept the changes in theory, at another level it supports the argument that one has the right to have an opinion and share it with others.
 
Written By: Sujoy Ghosh

Ricardo Darin | La Voz De Los Ojos | Statesmen

Many actors have their roots in TV Soaps. Few make impact on big screen as well. Few are recognized internationally and only a handful among them are respected as much as Ricardo Darin. Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Darin’s first rendezvous with acting happened when he participated in a play at age of 10. His parents were respected actors of their time. He started off with TV soaps and became a house hold name with series like Alta Comedia and Estación Retiro. Apart from TV shows, he was a regular at theatre that helped him evolve as an actor.
 
His first critical acclaim on big screen came with Perdido Por Perdido made by Alberto Lecchi. A thriller, movie was about a person who is one the verge of bankruptcy. He plans a fake car robbery which goes wrong. The situation puts him between mobsters and investigators. Darin’s versatility as an actor was recognized widely. This movie acted as his launch pad to world cinema. His movies in late 90s and early 00s established him as one of the biggest actors in Latin America. Nine Queens, El Hijo de la Novia, Luna de Avellaneda, El Aura were notable ones. El Hijo de la Novia is more known to cinebuffs as  Son of the Bride. In 2009, El Secreto de Sus Ojos (most of us know it as The Secret in Their Eyes) was released. This movie stamped his stardom and acting capabilities. A big success on BO, it grabbed many awards across the globe. The list included Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film.
 
Darin is known for his ability to infuse a sense of calmness in the scene with his screen presence. His voice and expressive eyes are considered to be his strengths. In many ways, he is similar to Mammootty as an actor. I guess that speaks volume about him.
 
Written By: Sujoy Ghosh
 

Playing With Pain | Part – 1 | The I In Cinema | Under Lens

The only issue that I have with Rockstar is the title itself. Period.

Having said that, Rockstar is bound to induce something which is rarely associated with movies these days – debate. And since some time has passed after its release, seven days to be exact, it can be safely said that it has baffled some, infuriated some and pleased other cinegoers. Which means, of course, it has given rise to some serious debate. Words as diverse as pretentious and masterpiece have wriggled their way into the description and analysis of the film. Needless to say, that is a good thing. So, where do I stand? Right after seeing the trailer, I’d predicted that the heroine would kill this film. Not that I didn’t go too far when I said that. Because, obviously, she hasn’t killed the film. I believe, the Imtiaz Ali, whom we knew, has come of age. And this is a film which I am ready to embrace, with all its flaws intact. Rich with properly fleshed out characters and filled with enough subtext and subtlety, Rockstar is one of its kinds.

Janardhan is a simpleton residing in Delhi’s Pitampura trying to make a mark in the world of music. After repeated failed attempts, he is advised by one of his well-wishers, a canteen owner, who goes by the name of Khatana ji, that he should forget about making it big. ‘Kyun?’, he asks curiously. ‘Kyunki tujh mein who baat nahin hai na..’, replies Khatana. After prodding Khatana for a bit, Janardhan is told that he must feel the pain of heart-break so as to become a true artist. Janardhan sets his eyes on the ethereal Heer, who he would later describe as the ‘hottest’ and the ‘coolest’ girl in college. After his disastrous attempts to woo her, Janardhan and Heer strike up a strange friendship. They go about doing the weirdest of things in town. Sample these – watching a blue film in a packed theatre, visiting the red-light area and so on. She even rechristens him ‘Jordan’. Soon, Heer gets married and leaves for Prague. Janardhan, now Jordan, after a series of events makes it big in the field of music, becoming an overnight sensation. Destiny drives him to Prague, where he meets Heer again and together they are drawn into a world of lust and obsession. Jordan and Heer have no idea what Jordan’s obsession can drive them into.

I would like to use a quote which I use quite very frequently – love is something which you know intuitively but you don’t know why you know it. Imtiaz not only toys around with this particular idea but also goes a few notches ahead and does something which tosses the formula of love in the bin and makes us look at a ‘love story’ in a completely different light. Here’s a film which bravely blurs the line between love and lust and in doing so it establishes that Ali has an idea of love and it is anything but the cutesy ‘love’ which we have come to see in his previous films. Ah, am blabbering endlessly about love, aren’t I? For this is the movie of a rockstar. See, this was the complaint in general by lots of people who I went to see the movie with. Rockstar is no more a movie about rock than Lakshya is a movie about war. Yes, I think that might be a valid statement. Might. And I’ll also agree that the only problem that lies with Rockstar is in its horrendous title. Of course, you won’t find any subtexts and metaphors there in the title, will you? So, why make a love story and name it Rockstar? Does Jordan turn out to be a ‘rockstar lover’? Pardon my rather weak sense of humor. And also because, I digress.

Something happened to me while watching the film. The only reviews that I’d listened to (hesitatingly) before entering the theatre were negative. I warmed up to the movie instantly and it’s something I can’t explain in mere words. The movie felt very raw, rough on the edges, uncomfortable even; yet, I found it immensely appealing. Readers who have seen the film will understand that I am talking about the post interval portions, which most of the reviewers had panned. Abandoning the convenient way of telling a story, Ali audaciously employs an interesting narrative device, instead – jump cuts. So, we have overlapping dialogues when the scenes jump back and forth, songs intercut with linear scenes and so on and so forth. What’s the point, you might argue. I’ll try to mouth this carefully. This is the journey of an ordinary boy who goes on to become a nationwide sensation. And by fracturing up the different phases of his life, Ali lets us into his mind. We live in him, in the moment. And we are as shocked as others when we jump to another phase and see him behave like a total tool. It provides a perspective and we gradually get a hold on the catharsis that Janardhan has gone through.

…To Be Continued

Written By: Gyandeep Pattnayak

Insights