Monday, September 16, 2013

Life Imitates Cinema | Editor's Pen

Dear friends…

Life imitates cinema as cinema imitates life…

Co-incidences are not that accidental as we usually assume. Some are so meticulously planned that no sound mind can pass them off as a planned act. But some are definitely accidental. Our next Under Lens series talks about such an event. Though it’s under development, I will dare to pass a hint – Last 12 Angry Men of India. Keep guessing.

Talking about this edition… we picked up two films of great repute for entirely different reasons but built around true events of industrial exploitation. Also, a statesmen  of some iconic films of yesteryears. Let us know your valuable inputs on the articles.

Meanwhile… we are working on our genre special – Crime And Mafia Special.

Thanks
Sujoy

Chinatown | Polanski's Best | The Critique

Whenever someone think of Noir, black and white images surface with few colored images. Those colored images are stills from Chinatown. Roman Polanski’s Chinatown redefined the noir genre. Incidentally, it was last film made in USA by the controversial director. With Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway in lead roles, Chinatown tests the morality of characters and poses a question for so called vigilantes of social order.

In the backdrop of scams associated with water distribution in LA, Chinatown starts like a traditional detective drama and slowly walks into a different paradigm altogether. Chief Engineer of LA Department of Water and Power – Hollis Mulwray’s wife suspects of her husband having an affair. Detective Jake investigates this and provides proofs. However, as it turns out the lady is an imposter and it was a ploy to ruin Mulwray’s name. Jake finds himself caught in a tricky situation. However real Mrs. Mulwray – Evelyn – is generous. She forgives him. As the fate would have wanted, Hollis dies in an accident and Jake has all the reasons to believe that it’s a murder. Cornered by forces and hostile police. Jake unwittingly opens the can of worms.

Chinatown is a story backed film with brilliant performances by both protagonist played by Jack Nicholson and antagonist John Huston. While Huston plays a shrewd businessman with strong grip on system, Nicholson plays a vulnerable hero. Dunaway, as Evelyn, complements Jack and in few scenes bursts like a nova. Supporting actors don’t have much to offer when compared to competent leads, they manage to do a decent job. Special note - Perry Lopez who plays a cop. Another highlight of this film is the sound score. Rated at with Chariots Of Fire, it blends well with the genre and expresses the sense of guilt ridden disgust prominently.

Polanski, as man and great director, will be remembered for right and wrong reasons but his legacy will always make a note of Chinatown which influenced a huge supply of films in last four decades.

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh  



Erin Brockovich | Dash Of Reality | The Critique

Swara Bhaskar in her interview told that she wants to play a character like Erin Brockovich. Even Kareena said something similar years ago. Julia Roberts portrayal  of lawyer-activist Brockovich won her Academy, Golden Globe and BAFTA apart from total makeover in career. Based on real story of PG&E being sued by commoners for keeping them in dark about contaminated water resource.

Troubled Erin is in a bad phase of her career. She finds a case of property settlement but unexpectedly she finds a potential case of malpractices adopted by PG&E to increase profits putting residents at risk. The groundwater is contaminated with chromium and this has led to many medical conditions to residents. She braves the situation and fights for the ignorant residents. Court, in historic verdict, holds PG&E guilty. Directed by Steven Soderberg, Erin Brockovich inspires the viewers.

However, despite of a decent direction and brilliant performance by Roberts, the film is plagued by paper-thin plot and superficial narrative. It fails to attain the pace and seemed to be dragging at times, especially in second half. Film neither succeeds in capturing the essence of a legal drama nor evokes emotions enough to keep audience involved. Though successful, film fails to sustain itself as a quality product it would have liked to be. Nevertheless, film good enough for a second or third watch.

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh

Robert Zemeckis | Art Of Imagination | Statesmen

Watching Bonnie And Clyde can actually be inspirational. Robert Zemeckis was motivated enough to think about joining a film school. His parents didn’t approved such an unorthodox idea. University of Southern California rejected him for his poor grades. Somehow, he got admission but the scene was anything but impressive. That was the beginning.  

Fascinated by strong and fascinating visuals, Robert was mentored by Spielberg. Robert’s first meeting with Spielberg is said to be a folklore of sorts. Robert bonded with Bob Gale at USC. They made a student film and won an award. This gave him enough confidence to approach Steven Spielberg and show his film ridiculing protocols. Spielberg liked what he saw. He backed him. His first few films failed. in 1984, Romancing The Stone was released. Speculations were of a failure. Film became a hit. First act thus accomplished. History was ready now.

He made milestone films like Back To The Future and Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 80s. Both not only were appreciated by audience, got nod of the critics as well. After exciting 80s, in 90s he made Forrest Gump which became a huge success and immortalized Tom Hanks as Gump. With awards and recognition, Robert became an icon of his own right. Not many directors have more than a handful of AFI nominations.

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh


Sunday, September 1, 2013

Realism On Screen | Editor's Pen

Hi Friends,

Recently two films released – Jobs and Madras Café. This weekend Satyagraha saw the screen. Indian collections of these three films won’t be able to match comedy extravaganza by Rohit Shetty – Chennai Express. However, in pieces, they will leave impact. Tragedy is that none of these three would remain in public memory. Regarding Madras Café, I might be wrong because of the political connection it has and point of view portrayed. These films have a problem – something you won’t feel in Mississippi Burning or The Social Network.

Realistic films are tricky romances. You overdo it and before you can realize, novelty is ruined. One need to balance between what people know and what people want to know. One need to realize that too many things can confuse people especially when plot has references to real world. One can add score of subplots in like of Golmaal and Chennai Express, no one will notice but you cannot do the same with Satyagraha. Remember what happened to Rajneeti?

Anyways, this edition has an exclusive interview with Raanjhanaa fame Swara Bhaskar. Show love.

Wishes
Sujoy Ghosh   

Swara Bhaskar | Learning Characters And The Person Within | Golden Podium

Recently Raanjhanaa came and impressed audience across the nation. It marked rise of Dhanush. But one character which gave us most of the laughs and tore us apart in the end was of Bindiya played by beautiful and promising Swara Bhaskar. Here is our exclusive telephonic interview marking growth of Swara…

01: Hi Swara, you hail from a progressive background. Your education at Miranda House and JNU must have influenced your growth as a person. How did acting came across?

SB: I have studied at Miranda House and then at JNU and was blessed to be taught by some very brilliant and inspiring progressive teachers who have had a very formative influence on me. I haven’t been formally trained as actor. I learnt Bharatanatyam from Guru Leela Samson. Acting happened at JNU with the student theatre group IPTA-JNU and under veteran theatre person NK Sharma at group Act One. As a dancer acting - abhinaya with dialogues interested me because dancing doesn’t require the performer to speak.

You can say I was seduced by camera. As a dancer there is a great distance between you and audience. Each gesture means something that needs to be interpreted. Then there is also the distance of language. Films are more intimate as a medium. I was excited by that. But frankly, I was always a very ‘nautanki’ child - film songs, Chitrahaar, dialogues. These things influenced me a lot. So after JNU I decided to fulfill my latent nautanki desires and, I landed up at Mumbai - CST with bag and baggage staring at the bustling city of dreams like the quintessential moment from films.

02: You have a theatre background. Theatre artists, with some exceptions, don’t find working in films as rewarding for the actors within. Tell us about your transition from stage to screen.

SB: I have done little amateur theatre in college. More sort of activist theatre. On stage, to be honest, I have danced more. Every actor from theatre will say that there is an organic connection when you perform live to audience. You get to live that character, grow into the character during rehearsals, travel that uninterrupted journey of the character during performance in front of a live audience whose reactions are palpable. It’s a whole different energy. As an actor, performing in theatre is far more satisfying.

Films, on the other hand, are all and all the director's vision. You might not get that organic growth as an actor. That growth is like homework for the actor. It’s not like theatre. Satisfaction lies in the final product, seeing yourself in 70mm, up close and personal and how audience feels about it. These two formats are not comparable. You should know what you are expecting. I love both of them.

03: Playing an important role in Listen Amaya must have been inspiring. How was the feeling of working with legends of parallel cinema - Farooq Sheikh and Deepti Naval?

SB: It was great. I would often joke with Director Avinash Singh that he bribed me into doing the film by saying that I will get to work with Farooq Sheikh and Deepti Naval. I feel privileged to work with such stalwarts, such iconic actors so early in the career. Funnily when I read the script I hated my character. Literally I thought Amaya was a horrid spoilt brat. Then I realized that’s where the challenges for the actor lies. As an actor I must reflect Amaya’s vulnerability. The audience will not be able to connect with the character unless you make it your own.

Farooq Sheikh and Deepti Naval are wonderful people. Watching them together at work was a learning experience in itself their craft, their humility. I was very comfortable working with both of them. The experience was thoroughly enjoyable.

04: Your roles in Tanu Weds Manu and Raanjhanaa had a very distinct feeling of Hindi belt. Even the little nuances, like the one in which Bindiya feeds with cows, are spot on. How do you prepare for getting the accent and behaviour right? Is there a method or instinct or you just rely on director's vision?

SB: Firstly I would like to credit writer Himanshu Sharma for creating Bindiya and her world. After all every scene and dialogue and nuance is actually his creation. And Aanand Rai who has given that writing vision and direction. My Nana (maternal grandfather) is from Patna and Nani (maternal grandmother) from Benaras. So I know the language. I know the places. I know that world. As an actor, I am very conscious of both language and body language. Amaya’s body language and vocabulary reflected an urban girl. Payal (in Tanu Weds Manu) was from Patna and educated in Delhi, so she had that element. Bindiya was an out and out small town girl, so her body and speech had those elements. I am a script dependent actor. I work hard on my scripts and pre-shoot preparation, then on set I try and improvise, play and stay spontaneous.

05: Across the platforms since your days in JNU-IPTA and Act One, what was the most challenging role you played?

SB: Funnily commercials are the most difficult ones. Your performance has to be so exact. In 30-40 seconds, you need to evoke so many emotions. The ICICI ad in the bookshop is my personal favourite. I am really lucky to work with good directors from the ad world. In films, the toughest part was my role in Aurangzeb. I had a very short time to create my world. Personally, I had no similarity with the character. Fortunately, I was in the good hands of a very talented director Atul Sabharwal. But my favourite part has been Bindiya from Raanjhanaa. I fell in love with Bindiya the moment Himanshu narrated the script to me.

06: As an actor what is your dream role?

SB: I am a greedy actor. I want roles that drain me physically, emotionally, spiritually by the end of the filming day. Suppose if Bindiya was the central character in a film. Talking about dream roles I’d choose Rani Mukherjee’s in Black, Julia Roberts’s in Erin Brockovich, Daniel Day-Lewis in My Left Foot, also Anarkali’s character in Mughal-e-Azam. I would love to do a period film. I would like some bubbly roles also like Kareena Kapoor’s in Jab We Met. I want it all. 

Team TRM would like convey best wishes to Swara for her forthcoming endeavors.


Nishaad | Sound Of The Last Note | Golden Podium

These days in Mangalore, I got introduced to Closing Frames. Busy ITians, putting in justified efforts on experimental short film making. I joined them and acted in one of their short films. Even though I have some experience of acting on stage in dramas, this challenge was new for me. It went well. With the same group, I got a chance to direct this new experiment “Nishaad”.

If you ask me to describe in a single line, Nishaad is “One scene one expression” experimental short movie for me. Expression of love through various phases in life and the ultimate conclusion of the expression!!! This is my debut attempt of direction. I realize that there are many things to think, when you get a Director’s chair.

All the actors & our cinematographer helped me a lot in making of Nishaad.  Above all, script & screenplay deserves a special applause. I never thought of getting into short film making, but this opportunity has given me new confidence & interest to do more experiments on screen.

We are inspired by Shyam Benegal’s making “Suraj Ka Satvan Ghoda”. Nishaad is tribute to makers of this ultimate creation. I wish to work more sincerely in this movie making field and will definitely try to produce more creative products.

Written By: Amey Joglekar (Director – Nishaad)

Madras Cafe | Not There But Almost There | The Critique

I will always bear the grudge that they named a thriller titled Madras Café. It would have been wonderful title for a romantic drama. Jaffna would have been more apt, undoubtedly. Sircar has made probably one of the most realistic war film made in Hindi. It has elements of every major Hollywood war film made in last two decades and blends it perfectly with prologue and conspiracy of Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination. Also, before people jump onto conclusions, Madras Café is not Kannathil Muthamittal. It doesn’t creates a strong opinion about Tamil cause. Probably, that’s where Sircar got his first step right.

Madras Café is nicely divided in two parts – genesis of Anti India sentiments among Tigers and assassination of Ex PM. Blending fiction with facts, Madras Café is not fool proof. It has its own share of mistakes. For example, there is an agent who is known as agent to everyone. But despite of such mistakes which are probably intentional to carry the story in the stated timeframe, Madras Café brings out elements of thrill and suspense nicely. At no point movie feels dragged. Top RAW agent goes Jaffna with a covert mission to overthrow Tiger leader Bhaskaran. After some hiccups, he does that almost successfully. His failure messes up nation’s involvement in Lanka. Enraged Bhaskaran plots Ex. PM’s assassination.

Madras Café however failed on two points – Pace and Performances. The pace of the movie is a little too much. Lots of information is provided and at times it is not backed with reasoning. Stretching movie by 10 minutes wouldn’t have hurt. Performances are on the inferior side. John is not convincing in most of the scenes. Prakas (playing Bala) and Nargis (playing reporter Jaya) did their part well. Dialogues could have been better. Editing was apt and could have been better. On the positive, cinematography and background score is simple brilliant. Blending video with stills especially B&W stills was a masterstroke. Direction is impressive. Shoojit Sircar has proved his point thrice. With Yahaan and Vicky Donor he explored romance. With Madras Café, he nailed the thriller. When is Shoebite coming?

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh


Jobs | iDisappointment | Critique

Thanks to makers of Jobs that they didn’t made it a chick flick. Well, partly they did but saved some points. There are problems with this being a biopic. But before we move any further on that, Jobs is not a bad film. It’s just that it fails to deliver what it set out to. Jobs is a nice little film and that’s it.

The movie tries to capture different events of Steve Jobs’ life – his days in Reed, early Apple days, his exit and return to Apple. Thanks to his iconic stature, there is enough material online to create a docu drama. Film however creates a rather flimsy outline and looks superficial in most of the frames. As the poster suggests, its colorful but not classy. It lacks the finesse of Apple products.

The element of crescendo is missing. There is no reason to love any of the characters. The audience-actor-character connect is too weak for a biopic. Except for one moment in the end when Jobs gives voice to commercial, there is no scene that gives the character any depth. Emotional scenes like his fight with girlfriend and Woz’s exit are wasted. The film and story fails to inspire in any way – an essential component of any biopic.

Ashton Kutcher is amateur. It reflects on screen. Dermot Mulroney is the only saving grace as far as acting is concerned. Other actors did their job given the scope and detailing. Camera work is good. Music is good. But they fail to help the weak script. Maybe it’s time to rework on this title. They made a shabby film for such a powerful title. Scorsese would have taken it to Mars. Moon, if he had a bad day.

Written By: Sujoy Ghosh